Ask the Experts: Alzheimer’s fabrication controversy
A couple months ago, Science revealed that an Alzheimer’s research paper from 2006, detailing the toxicity of an amyloid fragment, may have contained fabricated images (read more about it here). We asked Becky Carlyle (University of Oxford, UK), Mark Dallas (University of Reading, UK) and John Hardy (University College London, UK) to provide insight into what this allegation means for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research, drug development, scientific publication and the public. Questions Where did you stand on the amyloid-beta hypothesis of Alzheimer's before this allegation was publicized? How did these revelations change your perception of the hypothesis? What does...
To view this content, please register now for access
Join our member community for FREE to access a collection of journal and online-only features, including:
- Exclusive access to educational videos, eBooks and insights into top BioTechniques journal articles
- The latest news and journal updates delivered straight to your inbox when you want it
- Personalized recommendations for the latest member-exclusive podcasts, interviews and expert opinions
- Priority registration to webinars, panel discussions and events
- Access to competitions and journal publication discounts, including 10% off open access fees when you sign up today!