Transparent peer review: yea or nay?

Written by Naomi Handly

Two people reviewing a paper

Every scientist knows that getting a paper published can sometimes be as difficult as performing the experiments in the first place. Can a transparent peer-review process make this procedure less painful? After completing the experiments and writing the manuscript, all you need to do is submit the paper, get peer reviewed, and publish, right? Unfortunately, it’s rarely that simple. “Many scientists will have experienced peer review that’s too slow, or too critical, and where the different reviewers want to see every possible question answered with more experiments during revisions,” stated Andy Collings, executive editor of eLife, a journal that aims to...

To view this content, please register now for access

Join our member community for FREE to access a collection of journal and online-only features, including:

  • Exclusive access to educational videos, eBooks and insights into top BioTechniques journal articles
  • The latest news and journal updates delivered straight to your inbox when you want it
  • Personalized recommendations for the latest member-exclusive podcasts, interviews and expert opinions
  • Priority registration to webinars, panel discussions and events
  • Access to competitions and journal publication discounts, including 10% off open access fees when you sign up today!